Ranked League

[Instinct]

By the 15th of January, the top ten players of the Hall of Fame in Men of War: Assault Squad will receive one 1C Complete pack each!

To receive points in the Hall of Fame, you need to play and win ranked games.

So happy hunting and may the best players win!


Winners are!

* rimboss
* vinicyush
-=Agressor=-
* [RW][.-_Shotter_-.]
* Atstek
* Sean
* denaler
* BeLLMiilER
* }|{yk(BBC)
* azzar

* joesat1
* Aliados.KDB.C
* Black.Widow.US/anerok
* M18_๖ۣۜHellcaT{SPB}
* Sylar

[Fusseljack]

Congratulations for giving ten packages to the biggest exploiters out there. Right now i see current number one getting points by his buddys in 1v1 ranked games.

[Retia Adolf]

Well it's not hard to spot a person doing that, 100% win ratio.

[Blub0r2k]

i have 100% win ration on MoW-Vanilla , too and did nothing like that.

[nwader]

Congratulations for giving ten packages to the biggest exploiters out there. Right now i see current number one getting points by his buddys in 1v1 ranked games.

Starting games with a experienced friend using a new cdkey is also a sneaky way to farm points that I have seen some people do. It brings the team score down thus allowing for semi-noobs to play on the other team insuring a free win.

[michaeb]

Starting games with a experienced friend using a new cdkey is also a sneaky way to farm points that I have seen some people do. It brings the team score down thus allowing for semi-noobs to play on the other team insuring a free win.

The ranking system is so absolutely broken that is is 100% meaningless. The combination of crashes, drophacking through a router and abuse of the system all make it a joke.

Instinct would do a lot better hosting a tournament of some sort to be published on youtube, which might generate more sales instead of rewarding the players who are willing to blatantly game the system and why shouldn't they, there is no punishment or downside for doing so.

I've played so many games against 1.3k opponents who are absolutely worthless, just like this game:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z56Q3...3&feature=plcp

This is a game against the 1250-1350k russian ranking system exploiters. In this game it becomes apparent that they've built their rank just from exploiting, rather than any skill.

[Epidemic]

The ranking system is so absolutely broken that is is 100% meaningless. The combination of crashes, drophacking through a router and abuse of the system all make it a joke.

Instinct would do a lot better hosting a tournament of some sort to be published on youtube, which might generate more sales instead of rewarding the players who are willing to blatantly game the system and why shouldn't they, there is no punishment or downside for doing so.

I've played so many games against 1.3k opponents who are absolutely worthless, just like this game:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z56Q3...3&feature=plcp

This is a game against the 1250-1350k russian ranking system exploiters. In this game it becomes apparent that they've built their rank just from exploiting, rather than any skill.

Agreed.

I assume it's because setting up a tournament would be a lot more work involved.

Hell, a lot of work.

It would be really cool though.

[Evilsausage]

Hehe Michael that vid is hilarious
Just the russian dudes infantry micro where lightyears behind yours.

Yeah the ranked system is kinda broken, but it is really hard to get ranked matches to work in such a small game.
If the ranked system helps getting more players then it is atleast something good with it. Though i don't see much reason to reward the top 10 players, when we all know that many of them are probably not very good and has gotten to the top with the help of exploits.

I would also like to see a tournament. A 1v1 tournament. Why a 1v1?

A, Just by looking on inukis tournament, there was always some guy who could not play at a specific time and people only blamed on eachother. With a 1v1 it will be more pressure on the individual to play his game.

B, if someone is recording, its gonna be much easier to follow the action on a 1v1 then a 2v2 or 3v3.

C, 1v1s are normally very intense and not static at all.

With a decent reward to lets say top 5. and a really nice reward to the nr 1. I think it would get some people playing.
It could also be adverticed on the russian forum.

[Ragga]

been saying this since day one...

an AUTOMATCH SYSTEM would be the best!

yes there would still be those who could find ways to exploit it, but those number would be quite low compared to now.

[SS-Kommando]

been saying this since day one...

an AUTOMATCH SYSTEM would be the best!

yes there would still be those who could find ways to exploit it, but those number would be quite low compared to now.

Would it be possible to play with your mates with an automatch system, though? Not that I care much about ranked games myself, but I don't see why anyone would want to play a ranked teamgame with someone he doesn't know, considering that person might leave abruptly.

It would certainly work better for 1 vs 1 games, though.