Stealth or Strategy Missions?

[JARHEAD]

I like both as long as there is some balance between the two, but I prefer strategy missions with massive battles.

[mhtsos]

I prefer stategy over stealth, but I really enjoy when you have both in a game.
3 or 4 strategy missions to 1 stealth would be a good ratio.

[foxforcefour]

Stealth Missions are boring in my opinion - you're just going around in the bushes, hiding, doing some sabotage here and there.

Strategy Missions have the full fight in them!

[sgt_steiner]

most definateley strategy games are the best, my ideal is mostly 3v3 0r 4v4 map with some bigger and smaller maps too,

in sp missions maybe a part half way through some of them where you have to do a to get onto the main battle would be good!!!

[asureka]

I vote for strategy missions :P i think big battles would be great(big battles,tank battles and something like that).But stealth missions boring and there is no much action.thats my opinion.

~asureka

[Lloydyboy]

I vote Strategy but Not big Massive maps, meduim to large are ok for me, i dont wanna strain my hand from moving my mouse every second, just dont make another Louvain like back in Faces of War

[Zebah (szebus)]

stealth missions where on the same map the ai or other players playing heavy action.

[DDA]

This, although alot of the regular stealth missions in red tide were alot of fun as well. If only those darn german infantry artillery guns wouldn't turn and instakill you as soon as you were spotted

All of the red tide missions were pretty well done imo

[LegionnaireFandragon]

I prefer strategy battles. Not necessarily a large force, but instead maybe 2 8 man squads, a couple of tanks and a series of objectives, much like ive done in my own MoW mod.

I tried to make a series of stealth missions, but well, I dont know how to make triggers that would really give it a "stealth" feel. ATM they are all more like a 4 man assault and my dudes just try not to die while completing thier objectives.....