Page 9 of 108 FirstFirst ... 78910111959 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 1076
  1. #81
    Member Level 16 Blub0r2k's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,384
    Rep Points
    36
    Rep Power
    7

    Re: [MoW] GSM 2009 finally non-beta

    well take them, i have no problem with that as long as you like them

  2. #82
    Honor Member Level 19 Orrie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,007
    Rep Points
    5
    Rep Power
    8

    Re: [MoW] GSM 2009 finally non-beta

    Quote Originally Posted by Blub0r2k
    well take them, i have no problem with that as long as you like them
    Yeah I did, especially the mortar and flame sound (also the MG).
    Thanks

  3. #83
    Member Level 5
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    171
    Rep Points
    0
    Rep Power
    5

    Re: [MoW] GSM 2009 finally non-beta

    Ok I tried new version, seems alot more polished... couple of things I dont understand, sherman 2 with 105mm howitzer costs 50 points and penetration is less than that of sherman 2 that costs 30 points?

    Also where are all the new weapons like tommy drum?

    p.s.
    does anyone know what is the reason that developers decided to shrink the cap point zone (green circle) in victory flag and battlezones?

  4. #84
    Member Level 9
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    483
    Rep Points
    0
    Rep Power
    5

    Re: [MoW] GSM 2009 finally non-beta

    Ok I tried new version, seems alot more polished... couple of things I dont understand, sherman 2 with 105mm howitzer costs 50 points and penetration is less than that of sherman 2 that costs 30 points?
    That's because the Sherman howitzer is just what you said yourself when you said its name:

    It's an howitzer, thus an artillery piece not meant to take down other tanks but mean to be used as, well, an artillery piece. It's uses it thus oriented toward anti-infantry or busting fortifications such as troops entrenched in an house or such. It<s not meant to take down other tanks.

    Edit: Also recalls that a gun's caliber is not the only thing involved in it's AT capacities. Its velocity and the nature of the shell that's going to be fired will also play a big part. That's why for example that the long barelled 50mm Panzer 3 will be more efficient against other vehicles than the short-barelled 75mm Panzer 3.

    Or that the 57mm(iirc) russian Zis-2 is an infantry anti-tank gun more efficient than the 75mm Zis-3 that is rather mean as a field gun, meant to take down light vehicles or infantry with it's heavier(but slower) shells and it's faster rate of fire.

  5. #85
    Member Level 12 Gabriel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Spain, Madrid
    Posts
    875
    Rep Points
    31
    Rep Power
    6

    Re: [MoW] GSM 2009 finally non-beta

    isu-152 has disapear i hope this is a bug

    and antimines churchill has less powar with a 75 mm cannon than the 57mm one and the same with pz3 zapator
    GIVE ME - REP, PEOPLE CARES SO MUCH ABOUT IT. BUT ALSO CHECK MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL!

    My Youtube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/MenOfWar...?feature=guide

  6. #86
    Member Level 5
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    171
    Rep Points
    0
    Rep Power
    5

    Re: [MoW] GSM 2009 finally non-beta

    Hmm I think you should remake fog of war for certain units because, although realistic, maps are too small for current settings. And i think flakpanzer 2nd fog of war(for spotting vehicles) is bugged because it stretches for 100m atleast.

  7. #87
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    5
    Rep Points
    0
    Rep Power
    6

    Re: [MoW] GSM 2009 finally non-beta

    mod german soldiers 2009 is not compatible for single player?

  8. #88
    Member Level 27 Zeke Wolff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Fristad, Sweden
    Posts
    3,882
    Rep Points
    66
    Rep Power
    9

    Re: [MoW] GSM 2009 finally non-beta

    Quote Originally Posted by [A
    [GIO]Gabriel]and antimines churchill has less powar with a 75 mm cannon than the 57mm one and the same with pz3 zapator
    And so it should have... since the 6-pounder gun was indeed more powerful than the 75mm cannon... The advantage of the 75mm gun is that it could fire HE shells, which the 6-pounder wasnt able to do.

    ~Zeke.

  9. #89
    Member Level 16 Blub0r2k's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,384
    Rep Points
    36
    Rep Power
    7

    Re: [MoW] GSM 2009 finally non-beta

    it is compatible for singleplayer too, infantry weapon changes and gun data will change sp.


    thx zecke, i wanted to write exactly the same
    the only compromise i had to take is to give 6pdr. guns HE, cause they dont really have other guns avaiable for the use of he

    i dont know why the isu152 disapears, seems the buymenue is bugged with too many vehicles, as it was in soldiers.

  10. #90
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    5
    Rep Points
    0
    Rep Power
    6

    Re: [MoW] GSM 2009 finally non-beta

    however fire range for weapons and damage for weapons not change in sp
    sorry i speak little english i' am french in the base

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •