Results 1 to 10 of 22
Thread: Thoughts on the Sherman Tulip?
-
19-06-2012 #1Member Level 6
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Posts
- 251
- Rep Points
- 13
- Rep Power
- 4
Thoughts on the Sherman Tulip?
I've been testing it out in a few games and it's definitely no Calliope but it has a different use. It only fires a 2 meagre rockets but they are anti tank rockets which also have a notice incendiary effect much like the Katusha. It appears to be more of a spefic anti armour type of weapon then the other rocket artillery in the game.
Men of War Database: - www.thesoldati.com/mow
Men of War Unit Comparer Tool -www.thesoldati.com/compare
-
19-06-2012 #2
Well real life tulip rockets were based if not same as some of the rockets carried by planes for specifically anti armor purposes
/ Skirmish Missions by DJSatane * DJSatane's Twitch Channel \
=======================================
\ DJSatane@Twitter * DJSatane's Steam Games Picture Library /
-
19-06-2012 #3
It might track or damage the turret of a tank, I've yet to see it destroy one. Altough it is probably just as good as the new cromwell or the 105s in that role if it hits.
I will use it the same way as the arc-fireing tanks. The extra 1 MP might be worth the extra range.Last edited by Thompson-Nagant; 19-06-2012 at 11:46.
-
19-06-2012 #4Member Level 9
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Location
- the independent Repuplic of Poland
- Posts
- 544
- Rep Points
- 15
- Rep Power
- 3
I can see it's role as pretty nice counter for those brand new nasty nazi and commie AT guns.
[Hussars] - We are just two retarded guys...
-
19-06-2012 #5Member Level 6
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Posts
- 251
- Rep Points
- 13
- Rep Power
- 4
Men of War Database: - www.thesoldati.com/mow
Men of War Unit Comparer Tool -www.thesoldati.com/compare
-
19-06-2012 #6Member Level 9
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Location
- the independent Repuplic of Poland
- Posts
- 544
- Rep Points
- 15
- Rep Power
- 3
On the other hand 95 mm Cromwell has turret which makes it dangerous even after being tracked.
[Hussars] - We are just two retarded guys...
-
19-06-2012 #7Member Level 4
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Posts
- 113
- Rep Points
- 24
- Rep Power
- 3
In my opinion the Commonwealth took it in the shorts this patch. The Blackwatch are a less effective version of the Anzacs. All they get are a neat new MG and some new SMGs (Not new, they were on the royal engineers, but they're not very effective). How about adding a bazooka or something? Or add a piat or something to the Anzacs to justify buying them? Every other nation's units have definite advantages and roles.
I'm happy with the cromwell. I think it's the only decent unit the CW gets. I wasn't terribly impressed with the tulip.
-
19-06-2012 #8Member Level 7
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Posts
- 325
- Rep Points
- 12
- Rep Power
- 3
-
19-06-2012 #9Member Level 4
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Posts
- 113
- Rep Points
- 24
- Rep Power
- 3
The point I was trying to make was why have the two units who are similar? And as I suggested why not answer everyone's prayers and add an AT weapon to the Anzacs or something to differentiate them from the Blackwatch?
Last edited by GeneralJ927; 20-06-2012 at 09:36. Reason: Quoting previous post
-
19-06-2012 #10Member Level 7
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Posts
- 325
- Rep Points
- 12
- Rep Power
- 3
The ANZAC are better... they have more of everything and better skill levels. They are simply better infantry... especially from an assaulting perspective.
ANZAC have 10 men, more stars and more nades.
Blackwatch have a better ranged firepower, but less men and less equipment, but plenty of sandbags.
As a 1 ptr they offer defensive, ranged infantry support throughout the entire game... seems like a pretty solid 1 ptr to me.Last edited by Medan; 19-06-2012 at 17:21.
I play as [EPIC]Medan.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)




Reply With Quote

Bookmarks