Page 10 of 11 FirstFirst ... 891011 LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 107

  Click here to go to the first staff post in this thread.   Thread: Kv-85

  1. #91
    Honor Member Level 14 Windmaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    1,115
    Rep Points
    17
    Rep Power
    5
    Personally I'm not using any of this - prefer to use T-34-85 as it's faster.

    But all in all, I see KV-85 usually, and since last patch I haven't see any IS-1.
    >>> MoW-Center.pl <<< Polskie Community Men of War
    >>> Call to Arms Polska <<< Polskie Community Call to Arms

  2. #92
    Member Level 10 ShtoormoVick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Schneewirbelland
    Posts
    581
    Rep Points
    2
    Rep Power
    2
    I wonder for what such fancy really rare units, such as BM-8 (722 exemplairs produced) and KV-85 (about 500, or so, IMMDFM, produced; correction here: WWW says only 148 examplairs were produced...) are being pushed into popularization, and to disadvantage and disdain of by far more common units as well?
    Last edited by ShtoormoVick; 27-07-2012 at 00:32.
    Quote Originally Posted by ShtoormoVick View Post
    ...carma-gurus are welcome, since this unanimous rep system is a joke - I don't really care. But it may give you that little extra significance feeling: hey! your voice counts! YOU actually change something in this world! :D

  3. #93
    Honor Member Level 14 Windmaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    1,115
    Rep Points
    17
    Rep Power
    5
    Personally I have changed opinion about units - let DMS add and do what they want to do with units - of course if they will be adding new stuff. Rest is for modders. It's better if they will create even some rare stuff but they will do that, and modders will have toys to play with in mods.

    But that's true, such units are strange. Maybe competitive mode should be changed into realistic mode - that will add some fresh point of view to game.
    >>> MoW-Center.pl <<< Polskie Community Men of War
    >>> Call to Arms Polska <<< Polskie Community Call to Arms

  4. #94
    Member Level 6 Table's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    264
    Rep Points
    12
    Rep Power
    3
    Didn't DMS say that it was their vision to reduce the number of vehicles to a more numerically historical amount?

    Anyhow, at what price do you all view as fair for the KV-85?
    Infantry guide: http://digitalmindsoft.eu/forums/sho...-your-Infantry
    Uses of the different infantry squads guide: Link

  5. #95
    Member Level 10 ShtoormoVick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Schneewirbelland
    Posts
    581
    Rep Points
    2
    Rep Power
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Table View Post
    Didn't DMS say that it was their vision to reduce the number of vehicles to a more numerically historical amount?

    Anyhow, at what price do you all view as fair for the KV-85?
    I would just place a limit of one of them per player, and give it a price of about T-34-85 + ~150 MP.
    Last edited by ShtoormoVick; 29-07-2012 at 02:32.
    Quote Originally Posted by ShtoormoVick View Post
    ...carma-gurus are welcome, since this unanimous rep system is a joke - I don't really care. But it may give you that little extra significance feeling: hey! your voice counts! YOU actually change something in this world! :D

  6. #96
    Member Level 3 Mylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    65
    Rep Points
    7
    Rep Power
    1
    Anyhow, at what price do you all view as fair for the KV-85?
    Removed from competitive mode, heh.

    Seems fair to me.

  7. #97
    Member Level 10 ShtoormoVick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Schneewirbelland
    Posts
    581
    Rep Points
    2
    Rep Power
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Mylen View Post
    Removed from competitive mode, heh.

    Seems fair to me.
    Maybe, but maybe too harsh?
    Just make it a "king tiger" type - one per player per game, and 150 or even 200 mp more expensive than T-34-85.
    It's just always so too sad to see units leave competitive...
    Quote Originally Posted by ShtoormoVick View Post
    ...carma-gurus are welcome, since this unanimous rep system is a joke - I don't really care. But it may give you that little extra significance feeling: hey! your voice counts! YOU actually change something in this world! :D

  8. #98
    Member Level 3 Mylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    65
    Rep Points
    7
    Rep Power
    1
    Yeah? However, the unit is pointless. With old armour it was a slow T34/85. Now it's a more economical and surprisingly harder to kill IS1. No matter how you slice it, it replaces another unit that is far more suited for the soviet armoury.

    As much as I love all sorts of obscure/rare units on the field, it seems to me that all the KV85 does is either sits unused or removes other units from gameplay.
    I'm sure my opinion isn't exactly popular, but it is what it is.

  9. #99
    Honor Member Level 14 Windmaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    1,115
    Rep Points
    17
    Rep Power
    5
    I'm sure my opinion isn't exactly popular, but it is what it is.
    Maybe, but I agree with You

    KV-85 should be as expensive as IS-1, removed from competitive mode, and maybe even limited to one per game or with timer set that if you buy I don't know KV-1, T-34-85 or something heavier you will have to wait for example 10 minutes to buy it.

    As Mylen said - as it's always nice to have more units to suit players taste, gamestyle or something, it's important to make it right.

    We are getting in patches adjustment to increase medium tanks fight - what is very important and I really like such idea. Now KV-85 with it's price or even slightly increased price is still more useful then T-34-85. Beautiful model, nice tank and popular in history. But KV-85 is a heavy tank. So it supports heavy tank spam.


    In my opinion it would be better as a replacer of 2 T-34-85 in hero tree. It has twice as armor as T-34, and same gun. You can still buy BS-3 - maybe such KV-85 could cost 5 HP not 6 - so everything is fine.
    >>> MoW-Center.pl <<< Polskie Community Men of War
    >>> Call to Arms Polska <<< Polskie Community Call to Arms

  10. #100
    Member Level 10 ShtoormoVick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Schneewirbelland
    Posts
    581
    Rep Points
    2
    Rep Power
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Mylen View Post
    ...
    I'm sure my opinion isn't exactly popular, but it is what it is.
    Well, maybe, no, not maybe, but certanly unpopular opinion, judging by the games played , yet quite reasonable, but I can hardly imagine one medium-heavy tank to be game-braking , this time to be read literally.
    Besides, a pricing is a powerful tool, that needs to be used to diverse players' attention from it to other, more proper, in my opinion, units, and to make this particular one situational to the extreme.

    But overall, unless removed completely, it will still be in the game, so maybe you're more right, than not.

    Quote Originally Posted by Windmaker View Post
    ...
    In my opinion it would be better as a replacer of 2 T-34-85 in hero tree. It has twice as armor as T-34, and same gun. You can still buy BS-3 - maybe such KV-85 could cost 5 HP not 6 - so everything is fine.
    ..And don't touch my battlegroup
    Last edited by ShtoormoVick; 29-07-2012 at 21:45.
    Quote Originally Posted by ShtoormoVick View Post
    ...carma-gurus are welcome, since this unanimous rep system is a joke - I don't really care. But it may give you that little extra significance feeling: hey! your voice counts! YOU actually change something in this world! :D

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •