Page 4 of 11 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 107

  Click here to go to the first staff post in this thread.   Thread: Kv-85

  1. #31
    Member Level 10 ShtoormoVick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Schneewirbelland
    Posts
    581
    Rep Points
    2
    Rep Power
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Thompson-Nagant View Post
    Soviet Union is already the most versatile and forgiving of all the nations.
    Any worry about Soviet Union being OP is warrant.
    I call that "a bias" - put away you envy, comrade : it's not the SU that needs a nerf - it's every one else, except Germany, that are in need of buffs (but not made of some fantasy BS), especially Japan.
    Quote Originally Posted by ShtoormoVick View Post
    ...carma-gurus are welcome, since this unanimous rep system is a joke - I don't really care. But it may give you that little extra significance feeling: hey! your voice counts! YOU actually change something in this world! :D

  2. #32
    Member Level 16 Evilsausage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,523
    Rep Points
    79
    Rep Power
    6
    I can understand the change since the KV-85 was pointless before. T-34/85 was faster, had better mobility, better speed, cheaper MP and CP. So there was no point in using the KV-85.
    But can't say for sure if the price is right, im actually surprised its still in competative mode when far more unique units like JP4 isn't.

    I do agree that there should be more things encouraging people to buy medium tanks and tank destroyers.
    Its kinda crazy that we still have IS-2s for 1500 in points...
    Last edited by Evilsausage; 20-06-2012 at 12:40.

  3. #33
    Member Level 16
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,417
    Rep Points
    25
    Rep Power
    4
    I understand that KV-85 needed a change, but I don't understand this change. Why do we have two tanks that perform nearly the same in the game but one is for 1100MP and the other for 850MP? New players must be wondering now where the catch is?

    And the change is a bit problematic too. What should the price of KV-85 be now? Even if KV-85 is increased to 1000MP, it is still worth getting over IS-1. I wish DMS made a model of a USA tank that looks very similar to Pershing, has the same frontal armour and nice angles as pershing, has the same gun as Pershing but it was 250MP cheaper.


    Btw, can you imagine 3v3 Farmland now? Soviets vs Germany. We can expect KV-1 push in the early game with some emplacements and T-60; then there is going to be at least two KV-85s supported by 2x BM 8s. Middle Soviet player banks for 203 (just for a change ).

  4. #34
    Member Level 4 tanksnotdead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Hunland
    Posts
    112
    Rep Points
    13
    Rep Power
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by ShtoormoVick View Post
    especially Japan
    This. ^^ I rarely see japs in matches, its all against nazis.

    So lets give KV-85 to the japanese then, problem solved.
    They badly need it anyway.

  5. #35
    Member Level 6 Spoletta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    213
    Rep Points
    29
    Rep Power
    3
    With the recent changes Japan may be in a better shape than you think.
    Mow:AS unit list for 2.05.15
    http://uploaded.net/file/qsggsb9x
    Credits goes to [Epic]Medan.

  6. #36
    Member Level 12
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    883
    Rep Points
    12
    Rep Power
    4
    Just wait until they increase the armor of the IS1 to 120mm or so... :P

  7. #37
    Member Level 10
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    601
    Rep Points
    10
    Rep Power
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by Spoletta View Post
    With the recent changes Japan may be in a better shape than you think.
    Maybe Maybe. They have a lot of fragile equipment. I don't know how well they will stand up, when more longer ranged artillery and rockets starts to rain down.

    Their Heavy tank destroy is excellent though.

  8. #38
    Member Level 4 SeventeenPounder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    104
    Rep Points
    24
    Rep Power
    3
    KV85 was never UP compared to other faction's medium tanks like 76W and Comet (only the CP is too high), but the very cheap T34/85 made it useless. It costs 75MP and 2Cp less than the 76W. Be honest. Is the 76W better than T34/85? (the new T34 is bugged so im talking about the normal one)
    Last edited by SeventeenPounder; 20-06-2012 at 16:05.

  9. #39
    Member Level 6 Spoletta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    213
    Rep Points
    29
    Rep Power
    3
    The '76 has better penetration, reload speed, accuracy, accuracy by motion, speed and for the most part even armor. Also it relies less on the sloped armor, so it suffers less from high calibers.

    Yes the 76w is better than the old 34/85.
    Mow:AS unit list for 2.05.15
    http://uploaded.net/file/qsggsb9x
    Credits goes to [Epic]Medan.

  10. #40
    Member Level 4 SeventeenPounder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    104
    Rep Points
    24
    Rep Power
    3
    Yes, the 76W has slighly better gun. For what, if you dont have time to shoot with it? T34/85 has much better surviveability. You need 87mm penetration on the weakest spot while 76W needs only 64 with a medium caliber gun. T34 can be angled very well which makes it even stronger than 76w's max safe angle. The weak side armour is very high, so its easy target even from a bad angle and long range. Suffering from a higher caliber is minimal. Its only 2mm between 75mm and 100mm shots.

    So, the 76W is absolutely NOT better than T34/85
    Last edited by SeventeenPounder; 20-06-2012 at 23:38.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •