Lack of Sportsmanship In This Game

**Retia Adolf** · 25-05-2012

http://youtu.be/9Ir0Fdw9IvA?hd=1&t=8m43s

Effective implementation of above mentioned idea with a single infantry squad on an urban map. Because of infantry spread due to CP/MP constraints and necessity of concentration, it's effective. Weak so it doesn't penetrate deep, but the intended effect of drawing hostile attention is there, though team did not capitalize on it.

**Shootter** · 25-05-2012

Originally Posted by strat29

Agreed triumph everyone knows not to bother with rank..

I've also had many people quit before the 2 min mark as well.. you might remember last year, you played a game where a japanese tank killed 2 squads that belonged to your team. Then the game mysteriously closed and i was booted. I was of course under alias.

And you might recall you banned me from all of your friends games just because I beat you.. Where is the sportsman ship in banning people that give you a challenging game? Ofcourse I have replays to those games as well.

You may also recall two days ago panzer willow, and a few others beating you. The first thing you think of is we must cheat.

I know your other nickname "wangs dong" used to always boost your friends rating games as well.

Please,.. unsportsmanlike, give me a break... Full of @$@43

If you want sportsman like games feel free to join our games where we always balance the teams and support each other improve.

i agree, Triumph and his friends included Screamingeagleuk, who block most of the good players in this community can't come here and talk about sportsmanship when they kick everybody good because they want to play with their friends, agaist random newbies, Just tell me if anyone of you have ever seen screamingeagleuk playing a 6x6 team vs team... Or in Triumph's case loosing a game without making a drama and lately block the guy for no reason. Its a shame for a clan saying they are the best if they don't even play agaist good players. We all understand and we all like to play with friends but making a scene because u won't play agaist a good team? That's ***

In My case i never refuse to play agaist somebody Even if the guy is a douche, I love playing agaist very good players and teams, and if i loose i know that was a good game and i might learn something from it.

**FieldMarshallEpic** · 25-05-2012

I am a large believer in sportsmanship generally; I often order my tanks to hold fire if an enemy tank-crew are escaping, if an enemy is nice I'll let the remnants of an infantry squad or somesuch retreat unharmed, and so on.

If there's a stalemate, especially in a frontline map, I'll send a Lieutenant or Major or something in a jeep to offer a draw.

**Fusseljack** · 25-05-2012

Originally Posted by FieldMarshallEpic

I am a large believer in sportsmanship generally; I often order my tanks to hold fire if an enemy tank-crew are escaping, if an enemy is nice I'll let the remnants of an infantry squad or somesuch retreat unharmed, and so on.

If there's a stalemate, especially in a frontline map, I'll send a Lieutenant or Major or something in a jeep to offer a draw.

notsureifserious.jpg

**Retia Adolf** · 25-05-2012

Shootter, I think you jumped the gun pretty hard on what Strat said. He was not talking about or with Triumph past the first sentence. The notion of Triumph "banning" people who give him a challenging game is preposterous. Hell, even him joining a game with bad players in it - believe me, I've tried to lure him into some. The only type of people I know he has problem with who even have a chance to win are spammers that are mechanically good players but just mindlessly spam units - which you yourself used to be when I last played you.
I have no idea if you got better or not, nor do I really care enough to find out (unless Inukii records a new game spectating you), but I wouldn't play against a spammer either. Winning is more depressing and more of a waste of time than losing.

An elitist attitude, maybe, but it just isn't interesting to play when the enemy is just constantly throwing ****ty light vehicles and emplacements at you, hoping something sticks. You were better at it than the average Russian spammer but that's not saying much. I remember the mumble during games like that. Everyone was just bored, complaining and wanted to end the game fast by any means possible yet the spammers dragged it on.

Guess you gotta give them props for being able to do that. Only fun experience against that play style I ever had was calling in Flak38 and HMG one after another with 2400 MP banked just to give enemy 203mm something to waste ammo at.

**FieldMarshallEpic** · 25-05-2012

Originally Posted by Fusseljack

notsureifserious.jpg

Merely because I have morales. I am an Englishman, and as an Englishman I have certain principals.

**CzaD** · 25-05-2012

Principals who tell you what to do... ;p

**Inuki** · 26-05-2012

Screaming Eagle doesn't kick good players. He kicks people who

1) everyone else in mumble says they lag/low performance
2) They are lippy. Make hurtful demands like "Kick this guy who has been waiting for the last 5 minutes".
3) Are known to be bad people. Like leavers or bad manners.

ScreamingEagle and Triumph aren't huge friends to my knowledge. Your just lumping people you dislike into one big group.

If you enjoyed playing good people you would stop trying to play bad people. You constantly insist CG is a team of players and you want to play against them. They kick you because you insist on kicking everyone else who has been waiting patiently in the lobby instantly and without hesitation. You don't ask. You tell. Which is extremely impolite. Most of us arn't excellent players and we know that. You never hear about the in house games we play because they are in-house games. No randoms are their to witness it and complain. You are not their to witness it and complain.

You constantly tell them how ****ty their achievements are when they have no real achievements. It's not like we won a tournament with a big prize pool. Has anyone here won a tournament with lots of money? Anyone is welcome to join provided they havn't broken the top 3 thingies. We have a laugh. We get challenging games that are on our level of ability. We talk to new guys. We make new friends. We get new regulars. It is not a strict regime of training and improving. We accept everyones competence and level of abilities so long as they come in with a good attitude and make others smile.

It doesn't matter if your really good if your not a very nice person. "This guy nuked my family but he has asked to play me in checkers. I will honor him and give him that satisfaction". It's understandable. They have every right to. Of course from a spectator Inuki point of view who doesn't like a good high level high rivalry game to show the world. It's still the players choice though.

EPIC's clan mostly got bored of the game and no longer play. So I no longer see why how that post is relevant anyway.

I'm hungry. I'm going for wheetos

**Shootter** · 26-05-2012

Originally Posted by Retia Adolf

Shootter, I think you jumped the gun pretty hard on what Strat said. He was not talking about or with Triumph past the first sentence. The notion of Triumph "banning" people who give him a challenging game is preposterous. Hell, even him joining a game with bad players in it - believe me, I've tried to lure him into some. The only type of people I know he has problem with who even have a chance to win are spammers that are mechanically good players but just mindlessly spam units - which you yourself used to be when I last played you.
I have no idea if you got better or not, nor do I really care enough to find out (unless Inukii records a new game spectating you), but I wouldn't play against a spammer either. Winning is more depressing and more of a waste of time than losing.

An elitist attitude, maybe, but it just isn't interesting to play when the enemy is just constantly throwing ****ty light vehicles and emplacements at you, hoping something sticks. You were better at it than the average Russian spammer but that's not saying much. I remember the mumble during games like that. Everyone was just bored, complaining and wanted to end the game fast by any means possible yet the spammers dragged it on.

Guess you gotta give them props for being able to do that. Only fun experience against that play style I ever had was calling in Flak38 and HMG one after another with 2400 MP banked just to give enemy 203mm something to waste ammo at.

Even if strat 29 Isn't talking about Triumph I Do, Im not Spammer I get what i need, Im an agressive player if i need to get many infantry squads and get many light vehicles or many HMG or Mgs its because i know they are annoying and that they could help me to hold some point, Complaining because somebody get many of any kind of unit is stupid, everybody have their own playing style, I have many styles not only "spam" Stuff, "OH I lost my HMG but i killed alot of soldiers with it, but also im not getting them anymore because they are going to get bored because now they have to kill another HMG" I Agree and I understand that there is some people who just spam stuff in a stupid way, but that's not my case.

Originally Posted by Inuki

Screaming Eagle doesn't kick good players. He kicks people who

1) everyone else in mumble says they lag/low performance
2) They are lippy. Make hurtful demands like "Kick this guy who has been waiting for the last 5 minutes".
3) Are known to be bad people. Like leavers or bad manners.

ScreamingEagle and Triumph aren't huge friends to my knowledge. Your just lumping people you dislike into one big group.

If you enjoyed playing good people you would stop trying to play bad people. You constantly insist CG is a team of players and you want to play against them. They kick you because you insist on kicking everyone else who has been waiting patiently in the lobby instantly and without hesitation. You don't ask. You tell. Which is extremely impolite. Most of us arn't excellent players and we know that. You never hear about the in house games we play because they are in-house games. No randoms are their to witness it and complain. You are not their to witness it and complain.

You constantly tell them how ****ty their achievements are when they have no real achievements. It's not like we won a tournament with a big prize pool. Has anyone here won a tournament with lots of money? Anyone is welcome to join provided they havn't broken the top 3 thingies. We have a laugh. We get challenging games that are on our level of ability. We talk to new guys. We make new friends. We get new regulars. It is not a strict regime of training and improving. We accept everyones competence and level of abilities so long as they come in with a good attitude and make others smile.

It doesn't matter if your really good if your not a very nice person. "This guy nuked my family but he has asked to play me in checkers. I will honor him and give him that satisfaction". It's understandable. They have every right to. Of course from a spectator Inuki point of view who doesn't like a good high level high rivalry game to show the world. It's still the players choice though.

EPIC's clan mostly got bored of the game and no longer play. So I no longer see why how that post is relevant anyway.

I'm hungry. I'm going for wheetos

"Screaming Eagle doesn't kick good players. He kicks people who

1) everyone else in mumble says they lag/low performance
2) They are lippy. Make hurtful demands like "Kick this guy who has been waiting for the last 5 minutes".
3) Are known to be bad people. Like leavers or bad manners."

So u Think Thompson-Nagant or Greyfjell And MANY other friends have low perfomance? or Have hurtful demands? or are bad people?

Thompson-Nagant and me were in mumble when he told me that screamingeagle were kicking him and Grey, And if i Say Look Screamineagle have a game up my friends are the first to say -im going to play-
but it never happens because screaming kick us all. FOR NO REASON.

In a Game we were playing 3 friends with 3 random guys agaist Screamingeagleuk's team, u included, and u were laughing at us because we lost under unfair conditions, so My Whole Clan Had to get on smurf accounts to play agaist them because my clan were kinda annoyed of screamingeagle and it wasn't funny for them anymore, and there is a video in youtube that proves it, Judkins Have it... You Saying That Thompson-Nagant, Greyfjell, Judkins, Otto,Napalm, Raving, Strat29, Penetralia and Some other guys are in that little List?, nobody is talking about a tournament, and Long time i don't play agaist CG, They are a team and somebody we like to do team vs team or Clan vs Clan, or just a friendly game, Why not? Of Course its players choice, Rivalry is good and competition too but there is some players who bring it into a stupid childish drama (Me Included I know) Everybody can play with their own rules, but isn't cool when they laugh at you because they won with all the advantage.

-------------------------

Sorry For the Bad english, i hope u can understand