PDA

View Full Version : General News: Forums update & new website soon!



Instinct
08-10-2007, 11:14
http://www.digitalmindsoft.eu/outcoming/devupdate/thumb/dms.png

As you may noticed we went over the Forums in the last few days.

That happened because the launch of our new website and community portal is very close and will be hopefully done at the beginning or end of next week.

A few things may confuse you, for example why the News forums of Faces of War are now in the top hierarchie, that is because we will have only one News forum for all news we post, the website will syncronise the forums and newssystem we have.

Faces of War = Outfront 2?
Yes actually it is, it was the working title of Faces of War and now is the working title for the sequel of Faces of War, if the name will remain, we don't know yet. It may change during the time, but still better than just calling it the "sequel" ;)

Why Outfront 2 not Outfront?
Actually Soldiers: Heroes of World War 2 is Outfront, it was the working title of the game, so it's logical to call the sequel of it Outfront 2.


In addition, the forums will be integrated to the website and you maybe won't arrive it through your bookmarked link in your favorites, for the case it should not work, simply type in:
http://www.digitalmindsoft.eu
you will find the forums in the community section.


Well that's it for the moment, I'll keep you updated!

Tigerkiller
08-10-2007, 21:11
Can I ask why a new website? Is it too laggy? ;)

Instinct
08-10-2007, 21:21
As said, that will selfexplain as soon as you see it.

Slapping Penguin
10-10-2007, 08:20
Can someone explain to me?

Is their an addon pack or a sequel coming out!?

Mad Cat
10-10-2007, 17:14
It looks nicer with the new labels on the game designated forums :D . I still don't get the need for a name change for FoW though, especially after all this time has gone by since its release :? .

PrivateDwelling
10-10-2007, 19:02
I think the name change will help - FoW's reputation wasn't 100% successful, after all :shady: . Pity it isn't to be called SHOWII-2!

C0ntrol
11-10-2007, 05:37
I think the name change will help - FoW's reputation wasn't 100% successful, after all :shady: . Pity it isn't to be called SHOWII-2!
A namemonstar. :D I find Outfront 2 just perfect ^^

filon102
14-10-2007, 22:04
At least u guys came up with a new name, other than puting 2 in front of the old name (call of duty, call of duty 2, call of duty 3, call of duty 4 <=== retarded activision naming there modern warfare game, its just retarded, CoD are based in ww2 not modern times :wilting: )

Will there be a website that u guys going to make only for Outfront 2? as it was for http://www.facesofwargame.com i think?

P.S. I agree on the name, i told my friends about the game and they were asking "wtf is that? a movie?" lol BUt can u guys make comercials on television from africa to Hollywood :) (figure of speech)

C0ntrol
15-10-2007, 13:13
Just remembered that my godfather works for MTV3 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MTV3) 8)

Mad Cat
15-10-2007, 18:22
Yeah, commercials would definitely bring in more gamers to the community. It's a damn shame that S-HoWWII never got any airtime in the U.S.. I believe it would have had a much bigger community than it does now if it had.

But the StarForce protection also killed off a lot of potential buyers as well :P . Once a protection system gets a bad reputation in the PC community it's nearly a death sentence to use it in your product. I can only hope that the latest edition of the game won't have that in it.

Most of my friends who have tried out Soldiers and FoW actually preferred Soldiers over FoW. The main reason is the symbols surrounding the player's entities. Few people want to see a huge triangle magic carpet following their men and equipment over such lovely terrain. It takes away from the reality factor. The ingame controls are simpler and easier to use in Soldiers too. I gave my copy of FoW to a neighbor kid who thought the graphics on the box looked cool. He doesn't play it though :P .

C0ntrol
15-10-2007, 19:00
He doesn't play it though :P .
You got a funny neighbour don't you think? :pacman:

Mad Cat
15-10-2007, 22:26
He just likes Soldiers better than FoW. Same here. I don't like the triangles or some of the gameplay. I expected the sequel to Soldiers to have a familiar look and feel like other game sequels. I'm hoping the third installment does away with the large possession indicators at least. They really screw up the visual reality effect of the game :P .

DDTank
16-10-2007, 12:29
I'm with you Madcat! I hope the FoW re-vamp comes out more like Soldiers in terms of control (and strategy i.e. becomes less arcade-like).

Mad Cat
16-10-2007, 19:10
That's the word I was looking for, arcade like. FoW is an arcade like game :P .

Instinct
19-10-2007, 12:39
The mainfeatures are implemented and we are now bughunting and polishing the website.
Maybe we will launch it this weekend and add the missing features from time to time.

Gunguy
20-10-2007, 21:51
I think you should be able to put a MG up in a window. wouldn't that be cool? I agree with Madcat, the indicatior ruins FOW's scenery.

HrcAk47
21-10-2007, 01:01
I think you should be able to put a MG up in a window. wouldn't that be cool? I agree with Madcat, the indicatior ruins FOW's scenery.
Isnt this topic about new website? o_O

Gunguy
21-10-2007, 03:10
It is, dont wanna derail the topic. 8O The site is very cool. i like that snapshot with that big Ship gun. :twisted:

Mad Cat
21-10-2007, 06:50
Just killing time until all the new site features are added :realbig: . So far it looks mighty nice :D .

Instinct
21-10-2007, 10:18
All necessary features for the launch are added and we just need to bugfix a few things and the website will go live!

Albus
21-10-2007, 11:37
what happend with DMS logo ? In forums not visible.....

Mad Cat
21-10-2007, 11:51
??? I can see it.

EDIT: http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s108/MadCatOmni/doh1.gif My bad. I see what you mean now, Albus. I mistook your meaning for the siggy image :P .

Instinct
21-10-2007, 12:14
Don't worry, it will not be necessary in the future.

Albus
22-10-2007, 18:58
if not necessary, better delete that square with a red X inside.... ;)

Web is wonderful, Instinct