PDA

View Full Version : Trains and planes.



Land_Raider
10-10-2008, 00:26
Anyone in the beta, Maybe you could answer this for me. Is their -Any- new planes and trains in Men of war, Besides the Junkers 52. Please, Please tell me we get some armored train pieces? I'm going to explode if we don't.

Zeke Wolff
10-10-2008, 01:16
Anyone in the beta, Maybe you could answer this for me. Is their -Any- new planes and trains in Men of war, Besides the Junkers 52. Please, Please tell me we get some armored train pieces? I'm going to explode if we don't.

There isnt any trains or planes added in the beta at all. However, I cant say whether they are included in the real game or not (but if there is any new ones, thats another question). Some screenies has had a Flying Boat in them, so at least one new plane should be in the game.

~Zeke.

Mushroomcar
10-10-2008, 07:24
None in multiplayer so far, but..
I've seen some for singleplayer, like;

FW-150
A new type of the stuka (or improved)
Mk10 Avro Lancaster (unconfirmed, it's a guess since it's in the desc file.)

- Shroom

eenter
10-10-2008, 08:17
You will never know until the actual MoW beta or the full game will be released.

Land_Raider
10-10-2008, 10:22
What's the name of the boatplane in the screen shot?

HrcAk47
10-10-2008, 11:13
Mk 10 Avro lancaster won't be ingame. mk10 from the desc file is the Oerlicon gun designation, as seen in FoW.
Stuka will remain the same, only its desc has been altered.
FW-150 doesn't exist.

Flying boat is Dornier Do-24

As for new planes...

http://img224.imageshack.us/img224/120/29863041zk6.jpg

A6M2 Reisen/Zero
FW-190G8
Do-24 Flying Boat
Mk.II Westland Lysander
C-47
Polikarpov PO-2
JU52-A

Mushroomcar
10-10-2008, 14:00
Oh my oh my oh my! 8O
Have you been digging in the russian forums again? :wilting: Zero... my favorite japanese plane since bf1942!

Do you have screens of the other planes aswell? :wow:

Nice nice!

- Shroom

HrcAk47
10-10-2008, 14:26
You can see Polikarpov PO-2 during the menu animations in Beta. Do24 has been shown, aswell as JU52. Other than that, no. But i have pics of new Japanese tanks, though. I've shown them all some time ago here...

Albus
13-10-2008, 09:19
And this :

FW-190G8
Mk.II Westland Lysander
C-47
JU52-A

It is from SHWW2 and FoW.

elite [ Original ]
05-01-2009, 22:38
Use of air forces may make the artillery cannons obselete, i think
air strike capability shouldnt be added in multiplayer at all,
unless the game has working AA turrets that can take out the planes
without players using them manually.

But the paratroopers in otherhand should work fine with multiplayer
and help out alot breaching those heavily defended lines, and specially
handy for sending to sabotage enemies artillery and possibly supplys
if the game cosists a field supply capability.

P.S
Those who play FOW recommend taking aircrafts if the maps that has one.
From personal experience they are very handy for kamikaze runs on enemies
heavy tanks. ( Those who havent used them much recommend using the editor
to train yourselfs with kamikaze or bombing runs ). :ninja:

Orrie
07-01-2009, 03:09
Making the AA useable is already been done.
Youtube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ovl8sM6er4&fmt=18)

Rafo
07-01-2009, 03:58
Are Flak rounds possible? And i mean the ones that make the black puff in the air

elite [ Original ]
07-01-2009, 17:06
Based on that youtube link, it only shows that u can
manually hunt down planes, but can it operate on its own?
Will it know how to fast track an fast moving plane?

Koshiro
12-01-2009, 05:06
]Based on that youtube link, it only shows that u can
manually hunt down planes, but can it operate on its own?
Will it know how to fast track an fast moving plane?
Yes, it is slow at first but after the first salvo the plane that is flying over you is reduced to a burning wreck :hurray: It will rain Mustangs :insane: AAAAaaaaaaaaaAAAAhhhhh :blabla: KUGELBLITZ SPAM! :twisted:

Panzer_Elite
22-01-2009, 12:30
Mk 10 Avro lancaster won't be ingame. mk10 from the desc file is the Oerlicon gun designation, as seen in FoW.
Stuka will remain the same, only its desc has been altered.
FW-150 doesn't exist.

Flying boat is Dornier Do-24 *added* "Flying Pencil"

As for new planes...

http://img224.imageshack.us/img224/120/29863041zk6.jpg

A6M2 Reisen/Zero
FW-190G8
Do-24 Flying Boat
Mk.II Westland Lysander
C-47
Polikarpov PO-2
JU52-A
no Flying Fortress?what the F***!

C0ntrol
22-01-2009, 13:10
no Flying Fortress?what the F***!^10
What would we need it for?

Ease up on the exclamation marks. One or max two should do the job just fine.

Rebs
24-01-2009, 19:39
We need it for... :ninja: erm... To bomb down the part of the jungle where the japs are in?

Panzer_Elite
26-01-2009, 06:12
yes and its like an unfair advantage cuz axis get junkers and dornier and allies dont and it wont make the game historical enough

Orrie
26-01-2009, 11:56
yes and its like an unfair advantage cuz axis get junkers and dornier and allies dont and it wont make the game historical enough


Junkers 52 'Tante Ju' - CG-47 Skytrain
Dornier Do-24 - Why do you need a Naval Plane when you have J52?

Historical....
To make the game historical most of the whole game (Now I'm thinking of Faces of War) must be changed, because it was concentrated on Arcade.
But the airplanes only need the Supermarine Spitfire and ummhh, nothing more really.
We have Japanese, we have German, we have Russian and we have Allied(Except a British one)

Mad Cat
26-01-2009, 20:27
Historical....
To make the game historical most of the whole game (Now I'm thinking of Faces of War) must be changed, because it was concentrated on Arcade.

Man, you're really bringing me down with that comment http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s108/MadCatOmni/Soldiers%20emoticons/soldier_cry.gif. I got quite enough of that mess with FoW. I'm still hoping for much better out of MoW.

Zeke Wolff
26-01-2009, 22:42
Historical....
To make the game historical most of the whole game (Now I'm thinking of Faces of War) must be changed, because it was concentrated on Arcade.

Man, you're really bringing me down with that comment http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s108/MadCatOmni/Soldiers%20emoticons/soldier_cry.gif. I got quite enough of that mess with FoW. I'm still hoping for much better out of MoW.

Mad Cat... read Orries post again... he is saying that Faces of War was much too arcade... not Men of War.

~Zeke.

Orrie
28-01-2009, 09:33
[quote=Orrie]Historical....
To make the game historical most of the whole game (Now I'm thinking of Faces of War) must be changed, because it was concentrated on Arcade.

Man, you're really bringing me down with that comment http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s108/MadCatOmni/Soldiers%20emoticons/soldier_cry.gif. I got quite enough of that mess with FoW. I'm still hoping for much better out of MoW.

Mad Cat... read Orries post again... he is saying that Faces of War was much too arcade... not Men of War.

~Zeke.[/quote:2ptbkurd]

I hope I didn't scare you Mad Cat! Here, take these kitty snacks.
I feel Faces of War to be a arcadish version of the series, where Men of War will be the superior realism!
Men of War seems to be easier to script new things, so new aspects and actions when driving a vehicle might be possible.

Panzer_Elite
30-01-2009, 13:36
i tried it on FoW auto by them selves but vs a Mustang,no chance,quite hard....no hits....

Orrie
30-01-2009, 13:38
Its hard in Faces of War, yeah.
But it easier to learn in Men of War, tho, you still need some training. :realbig:

Panzer_Elite
31-01-2009, 08:24
Im a good shot you know!!I am only good with sniping but i might be good with AA

Mad Cat
31-01-2009, 10:24
You've got to lead a plane. Shoot just a bit in front of it where you think it will be, not where it is.

Panzer_Elite
01-02-2009, 11:31
dude!!i know how to fly a plan properly

filon102
01-02-2009, 16:10
Plane not plan plan is to make some stuff up for a situation. :D

Panzer_Elite
03-02-2009, 10:07
yes yes,i know,i just type too fast without checking filon