Mastix
11-07-2008, 17:12
First of all, my english is kinda poor so i'm sorry if sometimes you won't understand me.
Hi, im Erez and i played both SHoWW2 and FoW, had a BLAST! but i never thought this games were good enoughs to compete with other games cause some of theire problems, I'm going to look at some Major critic sites reviews about this two games, and other reviews of the sites readers, and my own opinion, looking at the flaws of both games, so they won't be in Men of War, so it will sell a lot more and be the best RTS.
First im'a start with SHoWW2, i really enjoyed this game, made me remember Commandos, but even better, this game major problem was the lack of Multiplayer and Skirmish, and the controls wasn't really bad, but could have been better, it got a nice average score of 7.8 and a nice fan base,
Faces of War was also good for me, but the reviewers didn't seem to like it, and it really had some problems.
The AI wasn't really good, well... it wasn't THAT bad... but it was really really ANNOYING, interfering my commands is annoying as hell, and the soldiers did alot of stupid stuff.
the Campaign, idk, was boring, i know it's hard to do a WW2 capaign and make it intersting... only few games made it (Company of Heroes + Opposing Fronts, And Codename Panzers...)
and the campaign wasn't good enough so i just couldn't play until the end.
the Squade thingy was kinda weird... and annoying... Please find another solution.
What was improved over SHoWW2, the graphics weren't improved THAT much but still excelent, the physics engine was freaking awsome.
direct controll on both games was great.
so my tips for you: make a BETTER campaign.
BETTER and not ANNOYING AI.
BETTER controls.
if that will happen, this game will be the most fun having in the RTS gernre. (i think that SHoWW2 & FoW are REALLY fun but not as say... CoH... cause the flaws).
Hi, im Erez and i played both SHoWW2 and FoW, had a BLAST! but i never thought this games were good enoughs to compete with other games cause some of theire problems, I'm going to look at some Major critic sites reviews about this two games, and other reviews of the sites readers, and my own opinion, looking at the flaws of both games, so they won't be in Men of War, so it will sell a lot more and be the best RTS.
First im'a start with SHoWW2, i really enjoyed this game, made me remember Commandos, but even better, this game major problem was the lack of Multiplayer and Skirmish, and the controls wasn't really bad, but could have been better, it got a nice average score of 7.8 and a nice fan base,
Faces of War was also good for me, but the reviewers didn't seem to like it, and it really had some problems.
The AI wasn't really good, well... it wasn't THAT bad... but it was really really ANNOYING, interfering my commands is annoying as hell, and the soldiers did alot of stupid stuff.
the Campaign, idk, was boring, i know it's hard to do a WW2 capaign and make it intersting... only few games made it (Company of Heroes + Opposing Fronts, And Codename Panzers...)
and the campaign wasn't good enough so i just couldn't play until the end.
the Squade thingy was kinda weird... and annoying... Please find another solution.
What was improved over SHoWW2, the graphics weren't improved THAT much but still excelent, the physics engine was freaking awsome.
direct controll on both games was great.
so my tips for you: make a BETTER campaign.
BETTER and not ANNOYING AI.
BETTER controls.
if that will happen, this game will be the most fun having in the RTS gernre. (i think that SHoWW2 & FoW are REALLY fun but not as say... CoH... cause the flaws).